Weaponizing the Presumption of Innocence and Reasonable Doubt in Voir Dire

Info
Credits

Weaponizing the Presumption of Innocence and Reasonable Doubt in Voir Dire

This program focuses on practical strategies for using the presumption of innocence and reasonable doubt as central advocacy tools during jury selection and throughout trial. The speaker explains that many defense lawyers treat these concepts as background principles or legal formalities rather than active components of trial strategy. Drawing on courtroom examples and case law, the presentation shows how jurors often begin a trial with implicit assumptions of guilt—simply because the defendant has been arrested, charged, or appears in court. The program demonstrates how defense attorneys can confront those assumptions early and reframe how jurors evaluate the defendant and the evidence.

The presentation provides concrete techniques for illustrating these legal principles in ways jurors can understand and apply. The speaker walks through practical examples, analogies, and storytelling methods that help jurors visualize the presumption of innocence as a starting point that places the defendant “ahead” at the beginning of trial. Similar techniques are used to explain reasonable doubt through everyday decision-making scenarios, such as choosing a babysitter, making a medical decision, or evaluating risks in daily life. These illustrations help jurors translate abstract legal standards into real-world reasoning they already use.

Defense lawyers who watch this program will learn how to integrate these principles directly into voir dire to identify jurors who cannot fully apply them. The training shows how to frame questions that reveal jurors who expect the defendant to prove innocence, who place too much weight on confessions or video evidence, or who require more certainty than the law demands. By “weaponizing” the presumption of innocence and reasonable doubt—using them to test juror attitudes and support challenges for cause—defense attorneys can shape a jury that is better able to follow the law and fairly evaluate the evidence presented at trial.

Eric Davis

Davis has been a practicing attorney since 1994 and accepted employment at the Harris County Public Defender’s Office in September of 2011. There Mr. Davis serves as an Assistant Public Defender. He is the Chief of the Felony Trial Division. As Chief, Mr. Davis supervises over 40 lawyers, eight investigators and several other administrative employees. He oversees training in the Felony Trial Division. And he still regularly defends and tries criminal cases, sitting first chair in multiple jury trials each year. Immediately prior to joining the Public Defender’s Office, Mr. Davis was the senior member of Davis & Associates, PLLC, a law firm based in Houston, Texas. Mr. Davis graduated from Howard University with honors in 1991 and from Tulane University Law School with honors in 1994. He is also a graduate of the Trial Lawyer's College where he honed his trial skills by learning from some of the best trial lawyers in the country. Following graduation, Mr. Davis was asked to join the staff of the college. He currently serves on the board of directors of the organization and helps train lawyers from across the country. In 2020, he received the Mentor of the Year Award from the Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association for his efforts mentoring and training lawyers. He received that same award from the Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association in 2016 as well. Mr. Davis regularly presents at Continuing Legal Education courses (CLE) and is routinely a top rated speaker at those CLEs. In 2019, Mr. Davis was recognized as one of the “Best of the Best” by the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers for a CLE presentation he gave that year on “Arguing and Defining Reasonable Doubt for Juries.”

TOPICS

Communication Persuasion Storytelling

CLE State Accreditation

General 1.00
General CLE-AL: 1.00
General CLE-WY: 1.00
General CLE-HI: 1.00
General CLE-GA: 1.00
General CLE-SD: 1.00
General CLE-NY: 1.20
General CLE-CA: 1.00
General CLE-PA: 1.00
General CLE-IL: 1.00
General CLE-MT: 1.00
General CLE-AK: 1.00
General CLE-MD: 1.00
General CLE-NM: 1.00
General CLE-VT: 1.00
General CLE-MA: 1.00
General CLE-DC: 1.00
General CLE-ND: 1.00
General CLE-OR: 1.00
General CLE-WA: 1.00
General CLE-CT: 1.00
General CLE-NH: 1.00
General CLE-FL: 1.20
General CLE-VI: 1.00
General CLE-AZ: 1.00

Weaponizing the Presumption of Innocence and Reasonable Doubt in Voir Dire

Weaponizing the Presumption of Innocence and Reasonable Doubt in Voir Dire

CLE State Accreditation

CLE State Accreditation: