Sex, Crimes, and Self-Defense: The Ethics of Burnout & Stress
The work we do defending allegations of sexual misconduct is among the most difficult work we could do, and among the most potentially damaging. We should take pride in our work, and joy in our gathering, but we must be aware of the damage that criminal defense can cause, and the ethical implications when we are not at our best. Every attorney must address their individual needs, and rely on their individual strengths. Doing either begins with recognizing what strengths we yield, and what burdens we carry. We wouldn’t do this work if we didn’t believe that our clients deserved the best, and that we can provide that service. Our ethical obligation to our clients requires us to maintain ourselves in a condition that leaves us ready and able meet our expectations of ourselves. We can do that.
This program is designed to help criminal defense lawyers recognize, manage, and prevent burnout while continuing to perform at a high level in the most emotionally demanding cases. Drawing directly from real courtroom experiences, neuroscience, ethics, and trial practice, the training explains how chronic stress, secondary trauma, and emotional overload affect lawyers’ judgment, preparation, communication, and decision-making—and what can be done to counteract those effects before they compromise clients or careers. Perhaps most importantly, this program connects self-care directly to winning cases.
Rather than treating wellness as an abstract or aspirational concept, this program reframes lawyer mental health as a trial skill. It shows how unmanaged stress narrows focus, impairs working memory, increases avoidance behaviors, and leads to unforced errors in court, while practical self-regulation techniques help lawyers stay present, persuasive, and strategic during voir dire, hearings, cross-examination, and argument. Viewers learn concrete methods for keeping the brain’s executive functions online under pressure—skills that directly translate to clearer thinking, better advocacy, and more effective courtroom performance.
The program also addresses the ethical consequences of burnout, explaining how stress and secondary trauma can quietly undermine competence, diligence, client communication, and professional judgment. Lawyers are given tools to recognize early warning signs in themselves and others, set sustainable boundaries without harming clients, and create routines that support long-term effectiveness in high-stakes criminal practice. These strategies are presented not as self-care platitudes, but as necessary professional safeguards that protect both lawyers and the people they represent.
Throughout the training, practical courtroom applications are emphasized. Lawyers see how grounding techniques, stress-management tools, and awareness of cognitive overload can be used in real time—at counsel table, during witness examinations, and in moments of intense conflict—to maintain credibility with judges and jurors. The result is a program that helps lawyers not only survive this work, but do it better, longer, and more effectively.
Logan E. Perkins is the District Defender of the Highlands Region Public Defenders located in Bangor, Maine. She graduated from Lewis & Clark Law School in 2012 magna cum laude, and is a member of the Cornelius Honor Society. She worked in private practice in State, Federal and Tribal Courts before becoming the first leader of the nascent public defender’s office in Bangor. In private practice she handled all types of criminal cases and a smattering of family matters. She has specialized in handling protestor defense cases, successfully obtaining First Amendment based acquittals, hung juries and dismissals in cases where her clients might have gotten arrested on purpose. In her free time, she is an avid competitive rower, including traveling with her team to the 2024 World Pilot Gig Championships in the Isles of Scilly, Cornwall. In 2024, she also grew a totally unreasonable amount of winter squash on the small homestead she shares with her husband, dog and chickens.
Justin Andrus practices criminal defense and provides ethics support and grievance defense from the Mid-coast of Maine. Justin has provided defense to consumers of indigent legal services since 2021, working first through the Cumberland Legal Aid Clinic in Portland, ME, before being licensed in 2002. His practice has included providing defenses to defendants facing serious criminal charges, including alleged sex crimes throughout his practice. For the past 15 years, his practice has included proving ethics opinions to attorneys, developing plans to remediate ethical issues or violations, and defense of grievance complaints before the Maine Board of Overseers of the Board and the Maine Supreme Court. In 2019, Justin took a hiatus from private practice to serve as Special Bar Counsel to the Board of Overseers of the Bar. In that role he provided ethics guidance to attorneys and investigated and prosecuted grievances. In January 2021, Justin became the second Executive Director of the Maine Commission on Indigent Legal Services (now the Maine Commission on Public Defense Services). In that role he worked through the legislative process to develop the public defense system in Maine from relying entirely on assigned private counsel to a hybridized system incorporating employed public defenders. During that period he oversaw the development and implementation of practice standards designed to promote effective representation, achieved pay increases for defenders, and implement processes to ensure the availability of collateral defense resources for client. In May 2023, Justin returned to serving clients in private practice. He enjoys and appreciates the opportunity to serve those clients, but particularly the opportunity to return to supporting other attorneys in ethical, healthy practice.
CLE State Accreditation
- Ethics 1.00
- Ethics CLE-HI: 1.00
- Ethics CLE-SD: 1.00
- Ethics CLE-NY: 1.20
- Ethics CLE-CA: 1.00
- Ethics CLE-IL: 1.00
- Ethics CLE-AK: 1.00
- Ethics CLE-MD: 1.00
- Ethics CLE-VT: 1.00
- Ethics CLE-MA: 1.00
- Ethics CLE-DC: 1.00
- Ethics CLE-ND: 1.00
- Ethics CLE-WA: 1.00
- Ethics CLE-CT: 1.00
- Ethics CLE-NH: 1.00
- Ethics CLE-FL: 1.20
- Ethics CLE-VI: 1.00
- Ethics CLE-AZ: 1.00
CLE State Accreditation:
- Ethics 1.00
- Ethics CLE-HI: 1.00
- Ethics CLE-SD: 1.00
- Ethics CLE-NY: 1.20
- Ethics CLE-CA: 1.00
- Ethics CLE-IL: 1.00
- Ethics CLE-AK: 1.00
- Ethics CLE-MD: 1.00
- Ethics CLE-VT: 1.00
- Ethics CLE-MA: 1.00
- Ethics CLE-DC: 1.00
- Ethics CLE-ND: 1.00
- Ethics CLE-WA: 1.00
- Ethics CLE-CT: 1.00
- Ethics CLE-NH: 1.00
- Ethics CLE-FL: 1.20
- Ethics CLE-VI: 1.00
- Ethics CLE-AZ: 1.00