This CLE program delivers a critical examination of the scientific underpinnings—or lack thereof—behind the diagnosis of Shaken Baby Syndrome (SBS), also referred to as Abusive Head Trauma (AHT). Viewers will gain a comprehensive understanding of how SBS emerged as a medical hypothesis rooted in speculative interpretations of biomechanical research, and how that theory has since failed to withstand rigorous scientific validation.

The program explores the historical evolution of SBS/AHT, the influence of child abuse pediatricians, and the central role that biomechanical principles must play in evaluating the theory. Viewers will be equipped to challenge SBS evidence in court by exposing its failure to meet the requirements of the scientific method. The presentation also breaks down how differential diagnoses are often improperly used to support SBS/AHT, and why excluding other causes is not scientifically valid unless the diagnosis itself is first shown to be causally possible.

For criminal defense lawyers, the benefits of this program are both practical and profound. It provides the tools to undermine SBS/AHT testimony through legal and scientific cross-examination strategies, highlights the types of studies and expert qualifications that can rebut shaky diagnoses, and reinforces the importance of challenging evidence that has not been subjected to rigorous peer review or biomechanical validation. This is essential viewing for anyone handling cases involving alleged infant abuse or complex medical testimony.